Every time I think we have a path to clarity about fish–such as in which fish to eat–a new, troubling report comes out. This one sounds like a planet: Yes, Mercury is back into the headlines once again. Maybe it never left, but the latest study indicates that if we try to eat fish, thinking that is a healthy alternative to beef, and we try to focus on the sustainable variety, we are still left with a crisis. The focus again is on![]()
mercury contamination. Not just a single kind of fish, but it seems almost all fish.
Once again there is a handy fish guide (A Mercury Calculator) directing us to safety and telling us what to avoid. The big question is simply: Is fish safe? Well it depends. Assume there is mercury contamination present in all US-water based fish. Then decide if you are asking about a young child, a pregnant woman, or a healthy adult. Recognizing that some fish contain less mercury than others and some should be avoided all together helps minimally. You need to know which fish to eat; some, such as canned light tuna, you can have multiple helpings of each week. One that is particularly high in contaminants is swordfish, a fish small children and women of child-bearing age should avoid altogether. The EPA even has this “One Fish…Two Fish” poster available as a reminder.
The most recent announcement from the US Geologic Survey says mercury contamination is higher than expected and almost impossible to avoid.
Know what you eat. It just gets harder to find safe, healthy foods.







#1 by Will Forbes at August 24th, 2009
| Quote
Every fisherman knows that its darn hard – perhaps near impossible to find places to fish that don’t have some sort of mercury (Hg) warning. Given how we hammer poultry farmers and cattlemen on the quality of their product from hormones to free range – you wonder why the Public has let mercury contamination of fish go sliding by! Between FDA, EPA, DOE and Interior – you’d think we could have gotten out arms around this problem.
Will